Kenya National Energy Policy 2025–2034
Kenya's Energy Policy, At a Crossroads: The Tension Between Renewables and Fossil Fuels
Blog By Bonga Na Gava
Kenya stands at a crossroads in its energy journey. With the National Energy Policy 2025–2034, the country is presenting one of its most ambitious attempts yet to reshape how energy is produced, distributed, and consumed. The policy sets out a wide-ranging vision: expanding renewable energy, achieving universal electricity and clean cooking access by 2030, strengthening regional energy trade, modernising infrastructure, improving efficiency and conservation, mobilising financing, reforming procurement, and advancing green industrialisation. It is anchored on four guiding principles: sustainability and climate action, energy equity and inclusivity, economic development, and good governance. On paper, this is a future-facing framework that speaks strongly to a just energy transition
The real question though is whether the policy can deliver on these guiding principles in practice, especially in a country where energy demand is rising quickly and the system is already under pressure.
Kenya’s Current Energy Reality
Kenya’s energy reality is deeply uneven. Electricity and petroleum dominate industrial and transport use, while over 60% of households still rely on biomass for cooking, with serious environmental and health impacts. At the same time, rapid urbanisation, industrial growth, and digitalisation are pushing energy demand beyond existing system capacity. This creates pressure not only on generation, but also on transmission, distribution, and planning. It is within this gap between ambition and reality that the policy must be understood, and when the objectives are unpacked, a clearer picture emerges of both progress and tension.
Renewable Energy Resource Development
On renewable energy, the policy strongly supports hydropower, geothermal, wind, and solar expansion. However, implementation is uneven: hydropower remains infrastructure heavy and needs stronger environmental safeguards, geothermal is more structured but still supply-driven, while wind and solar lack full integration with grid readiness, storage, and dispatch systems.
Overall, this reflects strong progress in advancing renewable energy development, but also highlights the need to close the gap between expansion targets and the system upgrades required to fully support a reliable and low-carbon energy transition.
Nuclear Energy
On universal electricity and clean cooking access, there is the inclusion of nuclear energy as a future baseload source, (a constant, always-available power supply that runs regardless of fluctuations in demand or weather conditions) although it is highly centralized, capital intensive, and heavily dependent on long term institutional and technical capacity that Kenya is still developing. It also introduces challenges around radio active waste management, safety oversight, and long-term environmental liability, which sit uneasily alongside the country’s strong renewable energy advantage.
Fossil Fuels (Coal & Natural Gas) in a Clean Energy Policy: A Contradiction?
Fossil fuels like coal and natural gas are part of its energy mix. Coal is presented as a way to support industrial energy needs, and this agenda sits in clear contradiction with both global energy trends and the country’s own renewable energy trajectory. The implementation plan within the policy, frames coal as a locally available resource to support industrial energy needs such as cement, steel, and ceramics, backed by a proposed legal and regulatory framework and a master plan for exploration and production.
This framing is fundamentally misaligned with the urgent need to transition toward clean, low-carbon energy systems.
The Environmental Cost of Coal
From an environmental and systems perspective, coal is not a viable option for Kenya’s energy future. Even with references to regulation and “clean coal technologies,” coal remains one of the most polluting energy sources, driving land degradation, water pollution, poor air quality, and long-term health impacts on communities. It also carries high risks of displacement and environmental injustice, especially in extraction areas. At the same time, global finance is rapidly exiting coal, making it an increasingly stranded and high-risk investment.
Natural Gas, A Transition Fuel or Transition Delay?
Natural gas is framed as a transition fuel, but it still extends dependence on fossil systems and risks delaying a full shift to renewables. Together, they create a tension between a clean energy pathway and a carbon-heavy backup path that may become harder to reverse.
Land Rights
Land is where all of this becomes real. Every energy project, whether renewable, fossil-based, or nuclear, depends on land, but land is not empty space, it is where communities live and ecosystems exist. Across the policy, land is still treated mainly as a technical step for infrastructure, rather than a core environmental and social issue. This creates risks of displacement, delayed compensation, and ecosystem fragmentation, especially when wayleaves and easements are not planned early. If energy expansion continues without putting land at the centre of planning, then energy projects, risk being unjust.
Energy Trade, Financing, Procurement and Infrastructure
As the policy moves into areas like regional energy trade, financing, procurement, and infrastructure development, transmission expansion is strong, but system operations like real-time balancing and storage are still weak. Financing reforms are ambitious, but constrained by project readiness, risk, and coordination gaps. Procurement reforms aim to improve transparency, but challenges like currency exposure and weak institutional alignment remain. Across all of this, the system is still more focused on building infrastructure than ensuring it works as a fully integrated, flexible energy system.
Green Industrialisation
The green industrialisation agenda adds another layer of complexity. Green hydrogen and critical minerals are positioned as future growth drivers. Green Hydrogen is generally a clean energy pathway when produced using renewable energy, if well implemented, it could reduce reliance on fossil fuels in hard-to-abate sectors like industry and transport. A strong environmental approach to green hydrogen would sequence development carefully, minimise ecological disruption, and ensure that every major investment is tied to real, proven decarbonisation demand.
Critical Energy Minerals
Critical minerals are essential to modern industries, including battery storage, wind and solar energy, semiconductors. Geological surveys show Kenya has significant deposits such as copper, manganese, rare earth elements, graphite, nickel, and cobalt.
Through Vision 2030 and green industrialisation policies, Kenya aims to harness these resources to support a low-carbon, high-tech economy.
While the critical minerals agenda reflects strong alignment with global demand for energy transition materials, there is prioritisation of exploration and extraction over industrial transformation, and this is where Variable Renewable Energy (VREs) like wind and solar offer a clearer and more immediate opportunity, by combining VREs with Energy Storage Systems (ESS), stronger grid management, and flexible power systems, Kenya can build a reliable and clean energy base that supports both industry and everyday use.
If properly planned, sensitive ecosystems are avoided and displacement of communities is minimised, Kenya has a real chance to build an energy future that is clean, fair, and beneficial to both people and the environment.
Policy Outlook & Recommendations
To conclude, In its current form, the policy does not fully go far enough to deliver on its own vision or consistently stand on its guiding principles. It sets a strong and necessary direction, one that recognises the importance of clean energy, equity, and sustainability, but it stops short at the point where ambition must translate into clear, enforceable choices.
The continued inclusion of coal and the expansion of natural gas reveal a deeper hesitation to fully commit to a low-carbon pathway, creating a dual reality that weakens the policy’s environmental credibility. At the same time, land, arguably the most critical foundation of the entire energy transition, if not treated with the urgency or protection required to safeguard communities and ecosystems, putting the “just” in just transition at risk, for the policy to truly deliver, it must move beyond balancing competing pathways and instead make deliberate, firm choices, fully prioritising renewable energy, embedding environmental and social safeguards at the core of decision-making, and aligning financing, infrastructure, and governance with a single, coherent transition pathway. Until then, it remains a well articulated framework with real potential, but one that still risks falling short in practice.
For the policy to truly deliver, it must move beyond balancing competing pathways and instead make deliberate, firm choices: fully prioritising renewable energy, embedding environmental and social safeguards at the core of decision-making, and aligning financing, infrastructure, and governance with a single, coherent transition pathway.
National Energy Policy
2025–2034
Enter your name and email below to generate a pre-filled comment letter to the Clerk of the National Assembly regarding the Kenya National Energy Policy 2025–2034. Review the email before sending.
#Your Voice Matters
Guide to Submit Your Comment
- Pick a section you want to comment on: E.g., Human-Wildlife Conflict (Part X), Wildlife Economy (Part VIII), Tribunal (Part XII). Use the “Arrangement of Sections” above to locate it.
- Compare with the 2013 Act (if needed): Use our comparison table to check what has changed from the Wildlife Act 2013.
- Check our Top Line Comments & Reviews.
- Write Your Comment Clearly: What’s a concern, gap, or unclear part? What do you propose instead? Or Copy & Paste our Topline Comments that resonate with you.
- Submit Your Comment on the BNG Website & also feel free to share your comments with the State Department of Wildlife.
We shall compile the comments and submit them to the State Department of Wildlife. Your Voice Matters! Make it Count!
